The trials and tribulations of someone, old enough to know better, trying to be fit, again.
Showing posts with label articles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label articles. Show all posts
Monday, April 16, 2012
March 2012, a great recovery
The one sentence summary for this month would be, most miles run in one month, so far, >50 miles. I'm going to put this all down to the 'Most Running in One Month - March', challenge in Endomondo. Turns out that this simple challenge becomes a huge motivator, so much so that I ran more in March than in any month previously, 54.76 miles, which also took me over 100 miles for the year so far. A lot of this can be put down to starting to try and run at lunchtime while at work and trying to maintain good running form, all in preparation for my upcoming first official half marathon, the Martian in Dearborn, Michigan. I'll leave it at that and get this posted now.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Calories and just how many am I actually burning?
This isn't about calories consumed, as there are a million sites out there that help with that, one fun one is Get Drunk, Not Fat, about getting the most alcohol per calorie, and there are a plethora of sensible ones, this is about how many calories are getting used up during exercise. The whole calorie thing isn't as exact a science as you might hope and many discussions go on, daily, on the many exercise forums on the Internet. I've found a couple of good resources about calculating calories burned and the associated VO2 max values needed in order to find out. In case you don't feel like clicking on the link VO2 max can be defined as the maximum capacity of an individual's body to transport and use oxygen during exercise.
My good friend, Endomondo, seems to base it's calorie calculations on either your weight, the type of exercise and distance (for distance based exercise), or on weight, type of exercise & duration, this seems fairly close in some occasions but not in others. There always seems to be a lively debate about whether or not the site is calculating it's cycling calories burned as too high, funnily enough the runners seem to say yes, but the cyclists disagree, who'd have thought it?
The reason I started thinking more about this was that my regular lunchtime walk involves walking around this inside of the Ford offices, I work at, regularly interspersed with runs up to the 7th or 8th floor of the Ford World Headquarters building. This gets me (a) sweating & (b) feeling quite put out by having to choose 'walking' as my exercise type in Endomondo. I'm certainly not walking all the time, I'm not stair stepping either, as I'm taking these stairs two at a time, but I'm not running either. I have said previously that I have a nice Garmin exercise watch that monitors my heart rate, so I'd thought I'd see what could be done with that information, hence this posting.
To start, lets look at a couple of workouts;
Both almost identical in duration, one with two more flights of stairs, but I can assure you that the second one was way tougher than the first. Ok, so now for a little analysis...
I found a cool blog about someone originally training for a triathlon, but now just keeping on exercising called Triathlon Training Blog, there is a page dedicated to trying to calculate calories burned based on average HR, see here. The problem with this site is that it requires that I estimate my VO2 max value, which led me to another couple of pages, Wikipedia & Shapesense.com, that will help me try and calculate. Let's use some of the methods mentioned on these pages to try and get a very rough feel for what my VO2 max value actually is, so I can see if I'm getting ripped off by Endomondo and my stair walking.
So we can see that based on four different calculations my VO2max comes it at around 43, so now I can go back to the calories burned to see what numbers come out of that, I'll just add a column onto the table created earlier, as it's easier.
Hey, guess what, I'm working even harder than I thought. I'm now in the process of creating a Google spreadsheet so I can do some more testing.
Note: In Endomondo's defense I really have no idea how far I am walking while inside the building due to GPS reception issues, but based on how fast I generally walk and how long I am out there I pick a nice round number and go for it.
My good friend, Endomondo, seems to base it's calorie calculations on either your weight, the type of exercise and distance (for distance based exercise), or on weight, type of exercise & duration, this seems fairly close in some occasions but not in others. There always seems to be a lively debate about whether or not the site is calculating it's cycling calories burned as too high, funnily enough the runners seem to say yes, but the cyclists disagree, who'd have thought it?
The reason I started thinking more about this was that my regular lunchtime walk involves walking around this inside of the Ford offices, I work at, regularly interspersed with runs up to the 7th or 8th floor of the Ford World Headquarters building. This gets me (a) sweating & (b) feeling quite put out by having to choose 'walking' as my exercise type in Endomondo. I'm certainly not walking all the time, I'm not stair stepping either, as I'm taking these stairs two at a time, but I'm not running either. I have said previously that I have a nice Garmin exercise watch that monitors my heart rate, so I'd thought I'd see what could be done with that information, hence this posting.
To start, lets look at a couple of workouts;
| Date | Duration | Av. HR | Max. HR | # Fights | Calories |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/12/2011 | 1hr 1min | 117 | 171 | 36 | 448 |
| 2/12/2011 | 1hr 2min | 119 | 172 | 38 | 448 |
Both almost identical in duration, one with two more flights of stairs, but I can assure you that the second one was way tougher than the first. Ok, so now for a little analysis...
| Equipment needed to find VO2max - and ergospirometry lab, funnily enough I don't have one and don't plan on picking one up any time soon... |
I found a cool blog about someone originally training for a triathlon, but now just keeping on exercising called Triathlon Training Blog, there is a page dedicated to trying to calculate calories burned based on average HR, see here. The problem with this site is that it requires that I estimate my VO2 max value, which led me to another couple of pages, Wikipedia & Shapesense.com, that will help me try and calculate. Let's use some of the methods mentioned on these pages to try and get a very rough feel for what my VO2 max value actually is, so I can see if I'm getting ripped off by Endomondo and my stair walking.
| Method | VO2 max (ml/kg/min) |
Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Resting Heart Rate Based | 41 | 20sec HR value of 21 |
| 1 Mile Walk Test | 42 | 15:30 for 1 mile pulse of 105 on completion |
| 1.5 Mile Run/ Walk Test | 44 | 12:00 for 1.5 miles |
| Uth—Sørensen—Overgaard— Pedersen estimation |
44.3 | HRmax=192; HRrest=65 |
| Cooper test | 43.8 | 2,478m in 12mins |
| Average | 43 | |
So we can see that based on four different calculations my VO2max comes it at around 43, so now I can go back to the calories burned to see what numbers come out of that, I'll just add a column onto the table created earlier, as it's easier.
| Date | Duration | Av. HR | Max. HR | Calories | Calculated Calories |
Diff. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/12/2011 | 1hr 1min | 117 | 171 | 448 | 624 | +176 (39%) |
| 2/12/2011 | 1hr 2min | 119 | 172 | 448 | 653 | +205 (47%) |
Hey, guess what, I'm working even harder than I thought. I'm now in the process of creating a Google spreadsheet so I can do some more testing.
Note: In Endomondo's defense I really have no idea how far I am walking while inside the building due to GPS reception issues, but based on how fast I generally walk and how long I am out there I pick a nice round number and go for it.
Location:
American Rd, Dearborn, MI 48126, USA
Monday, December 26, 2011
GPS Watch Can Be an Unreliable Running Partner
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/20/health/nutrition/gps-watches-may-not-track-runs-accurately.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all
I'll put it out there, up front, I have a Garmin Forerunner 405 watch and I wouldn't be without it.
I find this article to be very misleading. Let's be honest here, GPS technology is amazing and it is no less amazing once you know how it works, see here for a good introduction. The fact that you can have a device that sits on your wrist and can tell you where you are, anywhere on the planet to within 5 meters is nothing less than astounding.
I'll put it out there, up front, I have a Garmin Forerunner 405 watch and I wouldn't be without it.
I find this article to be very misleading. Let's be honest here, GPS technology is amazing and it is no less amazing once you know how it works, see here for a good introduction. The fact that you can have a device that sits on your wrist and can tell you where you are, anywhere on the planet to within 5 meters is nothing less than astounding.
Friday, December 23, 2011
Almost-barefoot running gains a toehold
The US air force finally decides that there may be something in this whole barefoot/ minimalist running thing after all - http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/10/air-force-almost-barefoot-running-100411w/
The US army kinda does the exact opposite - http://birthdayshoes.com/u-s-army-outlaws-vibram-five-fingers
The US army kinda does the exact opposite - http://birthdayshoes.com/u-s-army-outlaws-vibram-five-fingers
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Why 200 degrees below freezing in your underwear could be healthy | DVICE
Wow, sounds bizarre, but who knows - Why 200 degrees below freezing in your underwear could be healthy | DVICE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)